Navigating the Insurance Fraud Landscape: A Transatlantic Perspective

11 November 2024 / 2 min read

The United States and the United Kingdom share a common challenge and opportunity in safeguarding their insurance markets from fraudulent activities. However, their strategies, regulatory frameworks, and societal perceptions towards insurance fraud create a unique set of benefits and challenges for each nation.

A fundamental difference lies in the distribution channels for insurance policies. The US relies predominantly on traditional brokers, fostering a diverse yet fragmented market. Conversely, the UK has witnessed a surge in aggregator sites over the past decade, streamlining the purchasing process but potentially exposing the market to new vulnerabilities, such as policy fraud and ghost brokers.

uk-and-us-flags

Collaboration among stakeholders is another area where the two nations diverge. The intricate web of state-specific rules and regulations in the US generally complicates cooperative efforts, while the UK's more centralised regulatory structure facilitates smoother collaboration among insurers, law enforcement agencies, and regulatory bodies.

In the US, organisations like the National Insurance Crime Bureau (NICB) spearhead the fight against insurance fraud through three key pillars:

Intelligence, Analytics & Operations: With a robust team of 400 professionals, including field investigators, the NICB utilises data-driven approaches to detect and investigate fraud.
Education and Crime Prevention: Outreach and awareness campaigns play a crucial role in combating insurance fraud, as evidenced by the surprising statistic that only 75% of Americans under 45 view insurance fraud as a crime.
Strategy, Policy & Advocacy: The NICB actively engages in policy advocacy and collaborates with stakeholders to shape the regulatory landscape and implement effective strategies.

In the UK, organisations like the Insurance Fraud Bureau (IFB), who also manage the Cheatline and the Insurance Fraud Investigators Group (IFIG), work in tandem to combat fraud through investigation, collaboration, and public outreach.

When examining the types of insurance fraud prevalent in each country, distinct patterns emerge. Motor insurance fraud is the most common form in the US, while the UK has seen a shift from motor to other lines, such as property insurance, following the introduction of the MoJ Portal and OIC.

In the US, ISO provides a significant advantage with its centralised ClaimSearch database, containing 1.7 billion claims and receiving 63 million new claims annually from 97% of Property and Casualty insurers. The UK stands to gain immensely from implementing a similar system, facilitating data sharing and collaboration within the industry.

Despite their differences, both countries share a common outcome of insurance fraud – increased premiums for policyholders. In the US, fraud is estimated to cost $308B annually, while in the UK it’s estimated to cost more than £1B per year. However, the strategies employed to mitigate this outcome and protect consumers vary significantly, reflecting the unique landscape and challenges faced by each nation. One thing is clear: Greater collaboration may be the key to fighting fraud.

Working collaboratively with the US, we are now able to help identify potentially fraudulent images and documents using Verisk's Digital Media Forensics.